TutorABC
取得每週更新、新職缺通知和評論
TutorABC 員工評論

直話直講

1.0
勞逸平衡
薪酬/福利
工作保障/升遷制度
管理層
工作文化
2018年10月12日
一個禮拜能休到一天算很幸運了,有些主管還瞧不起無經驗的新員工,一天到晚拿業績跟邀約數壓你,你業績好做什麼都睜一隻眼閉一隻眼,犯了一個小錯,借此逼你簽自願離職書,原因就是主管看你不順眼,太沒想過一個新人在三個禮拜,你沒帶領好他又憑什麼趕鴨子上架,要一個0業務經驗的不到2周就有業績,也是一種運氣,某某7樓的TSR 6什麼2那主管讓我恨透了,sorry 他不知道他這樣能毀滅一個人的夢
優點
學英語
缺點
工時長,不給放假,給新人太壓迫
這個點評對您有用嗎?
類似評論
3.0
勞逸平衡
薪酬/福利
工作保障/升遷制度
管理層
工作文化
2017年4月10日
相同職務
語言諮詢顧問 (離職員工) - 台北市
在此工作典型的一天:
早上9-10點至晚上22點,期間需要開發客群,維護舊有客戶,語言分析及解說

以及文案審理,制式化開會討論,不定期更新公司制度變化及活動,例行文書處理


您學到了什麼:通過電話進行客戶拜訪,銷售及服務,了解說話技巧的魅力及優勢,能夠迅速掌握客戶主要的購買需求,以及為何而買,面對繁雜的一體化線上服務,能夠紮實的訓練自己的口才文書處理及案件問題討論與思考,也讓我更認識自己的工作想法


管理人員是否有領導力:通過專制制度文化,比較無法得以感受實質的領導氛圍,照本宣科的管理方式


同僚的狀況:兩年的經驗,與同仁間並無發生重大紛爭情事,相處融洽,各部門同事皆有各自發揮的特質


工作中最困難的事情:無法落實向上管理與建議,是非常可惜的一步


工作中最有趣的事情:與客戶建立感情,並指導學員如何學習語言,並從中獲得成就,以及與同事並肩合作,努力達成目標
優點
學習口說技巧, 客情問題及售後服務處理
缺點
工時過長與薪資不符比例原則, 文化專制, 作業流程冗長, 制式化會議效果不彰
這個點評對您有用嗎?
3.0
勞逸平衡
薪酬/福利
工作保障/升遷制度
管理層
工作文化
2020年6月11日
Quality Auditor (離職員工) - Taichung,Taiwan
Everyday work is busy and stressful, but you can learn somethings from work.
I learned analysis and organization skills,and Find the problem through audited to help the Sales Department improve the turnover raised .
這個點評對您有用嗎?
3.0
勞逸平衡
薪酬/福利
工作保障/升遷制度
管理層
工作文化
2019年7月31日
Online English Teacher (離職員工) - 台北市
I worked from home (Online English Teacher) so I didn't get to have much fun, but overall the experience was diverse and enriching. As I speak English fluently, the rest of the job was easy. Or so I thought. I had to schedule sessions with the students (from different ages and cultural backgrounds), provided by the company together with the standard lessons. When I got online to teach, the class started and the students got online too through a shared application for the next 50 minutes. Once the class ended, there was an evaluation process for each student on different levels and I was evaluated by them too. A recurrent problem I noticed had to do with the connection, the background noise as the students use to log in from their workplace or home, so some of them were disturbed by the noise coming from the others. Then there was the discrepancies in English level between those in the session (maximum six students), some of them not being able to grasp the meaning of some words, the pronunciation or the whole content of the lesson. This could annoy those more advanced and frustrate those with poor English. In any case, the lesson (12-15 pages or so) had to be fully covered in those 50 minutes, no matter how much some student were able to participate or not. A failing internet connection on their side combined with the noise and the rush to finish the lesson could and sometimes did lead to a poor evaluation on their part, which was frustrating for the teacher. But overall the experience is interesting and enriching.
這個點評對您有用嗎?